Monday, 15 June 2026

Kashmir

Kashmir After 

No society heals fully while part of the memory remains displaced.

14 August 2026

ANI on X: "#WATCH | Srinagar: On the Indus Waters Treaty, Jammu and Kashmir CM Omar Abdullah says, "...Our lifeblood has been drained; these are our rivers, and we had the primary right to them. Pakistan claims to be a great sympathizer of the Kashmiris, but when it comes to the issue of https://t.co/eHuKTzDbXK" / X it comes to the issue of water, that sympathy vanishes. Where was this sympathy when we were stripped of the right to utilize our own rivers? We have been bearing the brunt of this Indus Waters Treaty ever since... The Indus Waters Treaty is suspended, and it should remain suspended so that we can make proper use of this water." https://x.com/ANI/status/2088170562120274111/video/1

15 June 2026 

For decades, terrorism tried to amputate Kashmir’s plural identity. It wanted a Valley without its Pandits, a society without trust, and a future built on fear. Their return is a direct rejection of that violent project. Kashmir belongs to every community that shaped its history, language, faith, culture and conscience. No gunman, no extremist slogan, no separatist fantasy had the right to decide who belongs here and who does not. A dignified return of Kashmiri Pandits means more than housing and security. It means restoring confidence, rebuilding social trust, protecting memory, and making it clear that exile cannot become permanent victory for terrorism. Kashmir’s healing will remain incomplete until every displaced Kashmiri can return with dignity, security and mutual respect. The Valley must not only defeat violence. It must undo what violence tried to erase. 7:06PM 15 June 2026



Posted by at No comments:

Sunday, 7 June 2026

Think beyond


Argument, Ideology, Restoring the West, Human rights  

5 August 2026

But you cannot prove it. Then a document surfaces. And the fog begins to move. Around 22 July 2026. Two days after Delhi saw brutal violence. In the name of NEET protest. Then came the leak. A Google document. Titled: “Verified Student Protest Resources.” Not a slogan sheet. A sophisticated protest operating manual. At least ten working sections. Built as if someone had studied the day before it arrived. Before the protest. After the protest. Offline maps. Emergency exits. Buddy groups. Cloud backups. Bitchat. Briar. Tools meant to survive when the internet goes dark. Then harm reduction. What to wear. What to carry. How to face tear gas. How to protect the eyes. How to move. How to retreat. Then legal aid. Lawyers in Delhi. Lawyers in Mumbai. Arrest rights. Detention rights. Phone seizure. Medical examination. Silence in custody. Then medical support. Doctors. First aid. Then food. Water. Rain protection. Community kitchens. Donation links. UPI IDs. Bank accounts. Then accommodation. Gurudwaras. Shelter networks. Then mental health. Because apparently, modern revolutions now come with emotional aftercare. Then evidence preservation. Videos. Photos. Voice recordings. Cloud storage. Not merely to survive the street. But to fight the story after it. Then came the media layer. Selected pages. Selected creators. Selected “credible” voices. People to amplify. People to frame the narrative. Safety material resembled international protest templates. That proves a foreign command. And it proves experience. Someone knew protest architecture. Someone knew how crowds are sustained. Someone knew how arrests are handled. Someone knew what follows after the smoke clears. The document does prove someone inside and outside directed it. And someone big financed it. Food costs money. Transport costs money. Shelter costs money. Medical aid costs money. Legal defence costs money. Digital coordination costs money. Keeping thousands mobilised for weeks costs real money. My reading is simple. This was not merely spontaneous anger. This was infrastructure. This was preparation. This was professional coordination. NEET may have been the banner. But the machinery beneath it appears larger than what we have been made to believe. The agenda was something sinister. And the danger is still lingering around us. More will follow. Because the real question is no longer: Who joined the protest? It is: Who built the system that was waiting for them?  
Screenshots of toolkit in the comments.    2:49 PM 5 August 2026 

  FCRA and Women bill with delimitation opposed by Congress. ANI on X: "#WATCH | Delhi: Congress MP Jebi Mather says, "Our stand is very clear on FCRA. Our stand is very clear on delimitation also. We have repeatedly said why we are against it. Regarding FCRA, it is the killing of NGOs that are doing good charity to the poor. It is the killing of https://t.co/oe9nKhRLPY" / X  it is the killing of NGOs that are doing good charity to the poor. It is the killing of those minority institutions and organizations that are doing service to the country. Regarding delimitation, the intention is very clear: they want to cut the constituencies and create constituencies the way it suits them. We will continue to vehemently oppose both FCRA and delimitation..." 10:42PM 5 August 2026

2 August 2026

And when the Supreme Court permits investigation?
“We do not accept it.” Not appeal. Not review. Rejection. That is where protest changes into dangerous form. Peaceful protest is democratic. Violent pressure is not sovereignty. A government cannot erase criminal law at a negotiation table. An FIR has a process. Courts matter. Evidence matters. Victims matter. Once violence earns immunity, every future group learns: Votes are slow. Violence on Streets are faster. Tomorrow, one mob will demand a minister resign. Another will demand he remain. One will demand reservation. Another its removal. Then who decides? The larger crowd? The louder slogan? The greater violence? If streets decide everything, why elect Parliament? Why count votes? Why have courts? Why have a Constitution? “We the People” does not mean “we who gathered today.” It means every citizen. Even the silent one at home. If this continues, then: Law becomes negotiable. Pressure becomes power. Mobilisation becomes veto. That is how democracy dies. Today, the street demands immunity. Tomorrow, policy. Then judgments. Then power. Will the street speak and the Constitution decide? Or will the street decide, and the Constitution merely is a spectator?

17 June 2026

A beautiful thought expressed by NND Dubey regarding corruption in society, Bureaucracy must follow political leaders who are elected by the masses, but these elites must decide what is right and what is wrong. Capacity to decide is not based on education and selection, but it is based on character building, which can not be purchased with money, but it can be inculcated since childhood. Character building is a long-time phenomenon of society. It takes time to build and less time to degenerate. NND Dubey critisizes these executives of bureaucracy and not political leaders. Read his writings with peace of mind to understand what he is trying to convey. NND Dubey on X: "Excerpt:- Corruption & loss of credibility are merely symptoms. Compromised व्यवस्था is the disease. Windfall in political morality is temporary tenant but, systemic dilution of the Administrators is what needs the cure. Who is right & who is wrong is no issue but moral" / X  no issue but moral bankruptcy of permanent executive is of greater concern. Naturally, the public ire is directed at the ruling party for exploiting the State but more sinister reality lurks in the corridors of those who hold power. Moot question is no longer about the Neta we elect but, about the Guardians we select. Often they are party to exploiters beyond just following orders & in lieu they get reward & their Agenda through. Those who are sons of lesser God for the Power don’t remain relevant for political class. Is illegitimate act in States possible unless Administrators pave the way & cover it subsequently? Cover of political pressure is no longer a valid excuse. Power corridors are not victims of broken system; they are the high-functioning components that keep exploitation machine running.When survival instinct of a sycophant replaces the values, the Administrators cease to be an instrument of the State & become ruthless force for the rulers. We invest millions in selection & training of elites supposedly forging leaders of "Ethical Integrity." Yet, the ground reality suggests that we produce merely soft wing of political facilitators. Difference between oath and illegal order is the difference between protector and predator. If an officer’s primary skill is navigating political patronage rather than upholding the law, all Top exams are farce & training is redundant. 5:11PM 17 June 2026

15 June 2026

   Creative Deduction on X: "If you want to understand the modern left, you need to understand three men. One redefined freedom. One redefined history. One redefined power. Together, they created the intellectual foundations of much of modern progressive politics. Jean-Jacques Rousseau laid the foundation https://t.co/5m96CEorKk" / X foundation in the 18th century. He argued that man is born good and free but is corrupted by society – especially by private property. This idea that civilization itself is the source of inequality and oppression became the emotional core of leftist thought. Rousseau replaced the individual with the “general will” and portrayed traditional institutions as chains that must be broken.
Karl Marx took Rousseau’s romantic critique and turned it into a supposedly scientific system. He argued that private property and class relations were not just morally wrong but historically doomed. Marx shifted the focus from abstract human nature to the economic base, claiming that history moved through class struggle toward a final, inevitable revolution. His ideas justified the seizure of power and the total reconstruction of society in the name of progress. By the 20th century, however, it was clear that the Western working class was not going to revolt. Antonio Gramsci provided the next crucial development. He argued that capitalism maintained power not primarily through economics, but through cultural hegemony – the dominance of “bourgeois ideas” in education, media, religion and civil society. Gramsci concluded that revolutionaries must first capture the institutions of culture before they could seize political and economic power. This strategic shift moved the left’s focus from factory workers to universities, schools, media and the family. 
Together, these three thinkers created the intellectual architecture of modern leftism: Rousseau supplied the moral grievance against civilization, Marx supplied the revolutionary method and historical justification, and Gramsci supplied the long-term cultural strategy. The result is a movement that no longer primarily fights over wages and factories, but over language, education, identity, and the moral legitimacy of Western society itself.  3:08AM 15 June 2026 


14 June 2026


13 June 2026

DNI Tulsi Gabbard on X: "Today, I’m releasing never before seen intelligence revealing new evidence of past US government funding for more than 120 biolabs in over 30 countries, including Ukraine. In support of President Trump‘s Executive Order to end federal funding of dangerous gain of function https://t.co/RkPHnAbka9" / X federal funding of dangerous gain of function research around the world, and increase transparency and accountability, ODNI will continue working with partners across the Administration to identify where these labs are, what pathogens they contain, and what “research” is being conducted. 2:26AM 13 June 2026

6 June 2026

Restoring the West on X: "In her latest column for @RestoringWest, @Ayaan argues that a free society cannot survive when some citizens are treated as more equal than others. When governments, media, and institutions place ideology above justice, the innocent pay the price—and our children inherit the https://t.co/f97FmJgnXD" / X  inherit the consequences. "

Digital Citizens for Human Rights on X: "Tibet offers a warning the world cannot ignore. Under CCP rule, AI and surveillance technology are being woven into everyday life, turning entire communities into subjects of constant monitoring. What should serve humanity is increasingly being used to silence dissent and https://t.co/9ungsJnYRI" / X silence dissent and tighten control. The race for AI leadership is not just about innovation. It's about the future of freedom. 5:38PM 6 June 2026

Posted by at No comments:

Tuesday, 2 June 2026

Published Papers


1. Hate Theory 

This
@WorldBankGroup
policy paper examines how intergroup hate can emerge and spread, and provides practical tools and conceptual frameworks not only to respond after tensions erupt, but also to anticipate, diagnose, and prevent them. The analysis highlights an important development challenge: exclusion, inequality, and weak institutions can undermine both social stability and long-term development progress. Read the full paper "The Cycle of Hate, and What We Can Do About It": 1:29AM 2 June 2026
The Cycle of Hate, and What We Can Do About It by World Bank Group Feb 2026 / Policy research working paper 11304.



2. Realist theory by John Mearsheimer 

No theory is always right. But without theory, there cannot be any foreign policy. Theories are important if you want to train children. There are three main theories 
Realist theory
Liberal theory
Economic independence theory
Ideological theory
Marxist theory
Liberal democracies do not wage war on each other. If China becomes powerful, then China will dominate East Asian politics. This is realism.
You can not wage foreign policy without any theory. Realism is hard to sell. Convincing people that do not make China strong economically, for after twenty years or thirty years what may be the intentions of China. No one can predict intentions after a long time of economic growth. 
From 1800 to 2026, pick up the theories that can explain geopolitics. 226 years there were many events. 1814-1853, democratic peace theory can not explain / Economc independence / 
France - Britain and Russia fought with Germany and Italy. 
World War I, World War II, the Unipolar World after 1991, and the multipolar world after 2017.
Realist theory explains some details, but Marxist theory or ideology theory can not explain.
There should be a theory of how the world works. 
You can not know the intentions of the states. One is the capabilities of states, which can be assessed easily. But intentions are in the heads of individuals. It is very difficult to discern. Soviet Capability can be discussed, but what about intentions? "Tragedy of Great Power Politics"
The principal assumptions of Realism are 
1. Living in a state with no higher authority, among many states living together. In other words, an anarchic system. 
2. States are principal actors. There is no one above state to decide. Some have a more offensive striking capability.
3. Intions of other states cannot be known and are unknown.
4 Economic might can increase the military power
4 Principal goal of the state is survival
5. States are rational
If you mix them together, then there is a problem. If a state is powerful economically, then if intentions are unknown, it may lead to more military power.
The best way to survive is for a regional hegemon, such as the USA, in the Western Hemisphere. The USA is poking its nose in Europe and in Asia.
When a state is weak, then you suffer humiliation. China suffered humiliation from 1840 to the late 1940s. God helps those who help themselves.
The USA is powerful, and so it can roam around in other areas of the world. It is because it is a regional hegemon in the Western Hemisphere.
The Monroe Doctrine was articulated by the USA President James Monroe in 1823 that Europe should not interfere in the South American states or in Canada. James Monroe was the President of the USA.
Donroe doctrine is Trump's doctrine.

Posted by at No comments:
Subscribe to: Posts (Atom)