World War III - Ukraine War
Jaipal Datta in Tibetan Village in Himachal Pradesh, India
30 September 2023
"People are dying for inches in Ukraine, the World largest Arm Fair" Caitlin Johnstone.
Listen to John Heimer. According to him Russia may win 50% of the Ukraine area and then stop or end the war. https://twitter.com/i/status/1707754372552392960
22 September 2023
1. USA Vice President Kamla Harris tweets "It was an honor to see President Zelenskyy again. The people of Ukraine are fighting bravely to defend their homes, their families, and for the principles of independence, sovereignty, and territorial integrity.
We will not waver in our support."2. FM Sergey Lavrov: All of us should acknowledge our responsibility for the future of our Organisation & the world.
When global leaders signed the UN Charter they agreed to respect the sovereign equality of all states be they big or small, rich or poor.https://twitter.com/mfa_russia/status/1705040200877928734
.png)
Full text of Lavrov's speech at the UN Security Council, covering the history of Washington's proxy war against Russia, as well as UN corruption and the organization's failures to uphold its own laws and values.
***
https://twitter.com/CheburekiMan/status/1704883429203140891
Mister Chairman.
Mister Secretary General.
Colleagues.
The existing international order was built on the ruins and colossal tragedy of World War Two.
Its basis was the UN Charter, the key source of modern international law.
Largely thanks to the UN, it was possible to prevent a new world war fraught with nuclear disaster.
Unfortunately, after the end of the Cold War, the collective West, led by the United States, independently assumed the rank of arbiter of the destinies of all mankind and, overwhelmed by a complex of exclusivity, it began to increasingly ignore the legacy of the founding fathers of the UN.
Today, the West turns to statutory norms and principles selectively, from case to case, solely in accordance with its selfish geopolitical needs.
This inevitably leads to the weakening of global stability, to the aggravation of existing ones and to the ignition of new sources of tension.
The risks of global conflict are also growing.
It is precisely in order to stop them, to direct events in a peaceful direction, that Russia insisted and insists that all provisions of the UN Charter be respected and applied not selectively, but in their entirety and interrelation, including the principles of sovereign equality of states, non-interference in their internal affairs, respect for territorial integrity and the right of peoples to self-determination.
The actions of the United States and its allies indicate a systematic violation of the balance of requirements enshrined in the UN Charter.
Since the collapse of the USSR and the formation of independent states in its place, the United States and its allies have rudely and openly interfered in the internal affairs of Ukraine.
As US Deputy Secretary of State Victoria Nuland publicly and even proudly admitted at the end of 2013, Washington spent 5 billion dollars on cultivating politicians obedient to the West in Kyiv.
All the facts of the engineering of the Ukrainian crisis have long been known, but they are trying to hide them in every possible way in order to cancel the entire history before 2014.
Therefore, the topic of today’s meeting, proposed by the Albanian Chairmanship, could not have come at a better time, and it allows us to restore the chronological chain of events and precisely in the context of the attitude of the main actors to the implementation of the principles and goals of the UN Charter.
In 2004-2005, in order to bring a pro-American candidate to power, the West sanctioned the first coup d'etat in Kiev, forcing the Constitutional Court of Ukraine to make an illegal decision to hold a third round of presidential elections not provided for by the Constitution of this country.
Even more unceremonious interference in internal affairs was evident during the second Maidan in 2013-2014.
Then a whole series of Western travelers directly encouraged participants in anti-government demonstrations to take violent actions.
The same Victoria Nuland discussed with the US Ambassador in Kyiv the composition of the future government that the putschists will form.
At the same time, she pointed out to the European Union its real place in world politics from Washington’s point of view.
We all remember her obscene two-word phrase.
It is significant that the European Union swallowed this.
In February 2014, characters selected by the Americans became key participants in the bloody seizure of power, organized, let me remind you, a day after an agreement was reached under the guarantees of Germany, Poland and France between the legally elected President of Ukraine and opposition leaders.
The principle of non-interference in internal affairs has been trampled on many times.
Immediately after the coup, the putschists declared that their absolute priority was to curtail the rights of Russian-speaking citizens of Ukraine.
And the residents of Crimea and the southeast of this country, who refused to come to terms with the results of the unconstitutional seizure of power, were declared terrorists, and a punitive operation was launched against them.
In response to this, Crimea and Donbass held referendums in full compliance with the principle of equal rights and self-determination of peoples, enshrined in paragraph 2 of Article 1 of the UN Charter.
Western diplomats and politicians, in relation to Ukraine, turn a blind eye to this most important norm of international law in an effort to reduce the entire background and essence of what is happening to the inadmissibility of violating territorial integrity.
In this regard, I would like to recall that the 1970 UN Declaration on Principles of International Law concerning Friendly Relations and Co-operation among States in accordance with the Charter of the United Nations, adopted unanimously, states, "that the principle of respect for territorial integrity applies to States that respect in its actions the principle of equality and self-determination of peoples, and, as a result, having governments that represent all the people living in a given territory."
The fact that the Ukrainian neo-Nazis who seized power in Kyiv did not represent the population of Crimea and Donbass does not require proof.
And unconditional support by Western capitals for the actions of the criminal Kyiv regime is nothing more than a violation of the principle of self-determination following gross interference in internal affairs.
The adoption of racist laws that followed the coup during the reign of Poroshenko and then Zelensky banning everything Russian, education, the media, culture, the destruction of books and monuments, the ban on the Ukrainian Orthodox Church and the seizure of its property, all this became a defiant violation of paragraph 3 of Article 1 of the Charter The UN is about respect for human rights and fundamental freedoms for everyone, without distinction of race, gender, language or religion.
Not to mention the fact that these actions directly contradicted the Constitution of Ukraine, which establishes the state’s obligation to respect the rights of Russians and other national minorities.
When we hear calls to implement the peace formula and return Ukraine to the 1991 borders, the question arises: are those who call for this familiar with the statements of the Ukrainian leadership about what they are going to do with the inhabitants of the corresponding territories?
So, threats of legal or physical extermination are repeatedly made against them publicly, at the official level.
The West not only does not restrain its proteges in Kyiv, but also enthusiastically encourages their racist policies.
By the way, in a similar way, members of the European Union and NATO have been encouraging for decades the actions of Latvia and Estonia to defeat the rights of hundreds of thousands of Russian-speaking residents, whom they called non-citizens.
Now they are seriously discussing the introduction of criminal liability for the use of their native language.
Senior officials have officially stated that the dissemination of information about the possibility of local students taking Russian distance school programs should be considered almost a threat to national security, and this requires the attention of law enforcement agencies.
Returning to Ukraine.
The signing of the Minsk agreements in February 2015 was approved by a special resolution of the Security Council, in full compliance with Article 36 of the Charter, "supporting any procedure for resolving the dispute that was accepted by the parties, in this case Kiev, Donetsk and Lugansk."
However, last year, all the signatories of the Minsk agreements, except Vladimir Putin, and these are Merkel, Hollande and Poroshenko, publicly and even with pleasure admitted that when they signed this document, they did not intend to implement it.
They only sought to gain time to strengthen Ukraine’s military potential and pump it up with weapons against Russia.
All these years, the EU and NATO directly supported the sabotage of the Minsk agreements, pushing the Kiev regime to forcefully resolve the Donbass problem.
This was done in violation of Article 25 of the Charter, according to which all UN members are obliged to obey and implement the decisions of the Security Council.
Let me remind you that in the package with the Minsk agreements, the leaders of Russia, Germany, France and Ukraine signed a declaration in which Berlin and Paris pledged to do a lot, including helping to restore the banking system in Donbass.
But they didn't lift a finger.
They only watched as, contrary to all these obligations, Poroshenko declared a trade, economic and transport blockade of Donbass.
In the same declaration, Berlin and Paris pledged to promote the strengthening of trilateral cooperation in the European Union-Russia-Ukraine format for the practical solution of issues that concern Russia in the field of trade, "as well as to promote the creation of a common humanitarian and economic space from the Atlantic to the Pacific Ocean."
This declaration was also approved by the Security Council and it was also subject to implementation in accordance with the mentioned Article 25 of the UN Charter.
But this commitment by the leaders of Germany and France turned out to be empty, another violation of the statutory principles.
The legendary Minister of Foreign Affairs of the Soviet Union, mister Gromyko, rightly noted many times: it is better to have ten years of negotiations than one day of war.
Following this covenant, we negotiated for many, many years.
We sought the conclusion of agreements in the field of European security.
We approved the Russia-NATO Founding Act.
We adopted OSCE declarations on the indivisibility of security at the highest level in 1999 and 2010.
And since 2015, we have insisted on the unconditional implementation of the Minsk agreements that were the result of the negotiations.
This is all in full compliance with the UN Charter, which requires, "to ensure conditions for fairness and respect for obligations arising from treaties and other sources of international law."
Western colleagues also ignored this principle when they signed all these documents, knowing in advance that they would not comply with them.
Speaking of negotiations.
We still do not refuse them.
President Putin spoke about this many times, including most recently.
And, I would like to remind the distinguished Secretary of State that President Zelensky signed a decree prohibiting negotiations with the Putin government.
If the United States is so interested in negotiations, then I think that it will not be difficult for them to give the command so that this Zelensky decree is canceled.
Today in the rhetoric of our opponents we hear only slogans about invasion, aggression, annexation.
They don’t say a word about the underlying causes of the problem, about how for many years they nurtured an openly Nazi regime that openly rewrote the results of the World War Two and the history of its own people.
The West avoids a substantive conversation based on facts and respect for all the requirements of the UN Charter.
Apparently, it has no arguments for an honest dialogue.
There is a strong impression that Western representatives are afraid of professional discussions that expose their demagoguery.
While pronouncing incantations about the territorial integrity of Ukraine, the former colonial metropolises are keeping silent about the UN decisions on the need for Paris to return the so-called French Mayotte to the Union of the Comoros Islands, and for London to leave the Chagos Archipelago and begin negotiations with Buenos Aires on the Malvinas Islands.
These supporters of the territorial integrity of Ukraine are now pretending that they do not remember the meaning of the Minsk agreements, let me remind you, which was concluded for the reunification of Donbass with Ukraine with guarantees of respect for fundamental human rights, first of all, the right to one’s native language.
The West, which thwarted the implementation of these agreements, bears direct responsibility for the collapse of Ukraine and for inciting a civil war there.
Among other principles of the UN Charter, respect for which could prevent a security crisis in Europe and help agree on confidence-building measures based on a balance of interests, I will note Article 2 of Chapter 8 of the UN Charter.
It enshrines the need to develop the practice of peaceful resolution of disputes with the help of regional organizations.
In accordance with this principle, Russia, together with its allies, has consistently advocated the establishment of contacts between the Collective Security Treaty Organization, the CSTO, and NATO to facilitate the practical implementation of the above-mentioned decisions of the OSCE summits on the indivisibility of security, providing, in particular, the following:
"That no single state, group of states, or organization can be given primary responsibility for maintaining peace and stability in the OSCE region, or consider any part of that region as its sphere of influence."
Everyone knows that this is exactly what NATO has been doing: it has been trying to create its full advantage in Europe, and now in the Asia-Pacific region.
But numerous appeals from the highest bodies of the CSTO to NATO were ignored.
The reason for such an arrogant position of the United States and its allies, as everyone can see today, is the reluctance to conduct any kind of equal dialogue with anyone.
If NATO had not rejected the CSTO's proposals for cooperation, then perhaps this would have avoided many of the negative processes that led to the current European crisis due to the fact that for decades they refused to listen to Russia, or they deceived it.
Today, when, at the suggestion of the Chairmanship, we discuss effective multilateralism, we should not forget about the numerous facts of the West’s complete rejection of any form of equal cooperation.
Consider Borrell’s statement that Europe is a blooming garden surrounded by jungle.
This is a purely neocolonial syndrome that despises the sovereign equality of states and the tasks of strengthening the principles of the UN Charter through effective multilateralism, which are brought to our discussion today.
In an effort to prevent the democratization of interstate relations, the United States and its allies are increasingly openly and unceremoniously privatizing the secretariats of international organizations.
They are pushing through, bypassing established procedures, decisions to create mechanisms subordinate to them with non-consensual mandates, but with a claim to the right to blame those who for some reason are not pleasing to Washington.
In this regard, I would like to remind you of the need for strict implementation of the UN Charter not only by member states, but also by the Secretariat of our organization.
In accordance with Article 100 of the Charter, the Secretariat is required to act impartially and it must not receive instructions from any government.
We have already talked about Article 2 of the UN Charter.
And, I want to draw your attention to its key item number 1: The Organization is based on the principle of the sovereign equality of states.
Developing this principle, the UN General Assembly, in the 1970 Declaration I mentioned, confirmed, "the inalienable right of every state to choose its political, economic, social and cultural system without interference from anyone."
In this regard, we have serious questions about the statements that our distinguished Secretary General made on March 29 that, "autocratic rule does not guarantee stability, it is a catalyst for chaos and conflict, and strong democratic societies are capable of self-correction and self-improvement. They can stimulate change, even radical change, without bloodshed or violence."
I can’t help but remember the changes brought about by the aggressive adventures of strong democracies in Yugoslavia, Afghanistan, Iraq, Libya, Syria, and many other countries.
The honorable Antonio Guterres went on to say, and "that democracies are centers of broad cooperation rooted in the principles of equality, participation and solidarity."
It is noteworthy that all these speeches were made at the so-called Summit for Democracy, convened by President Joe Biden outside the UN, the participants of which were selected by the American administration on the basis of loyalty, and loyalty not so much to Washington as to the ruling Democratic Party in the United States.
Attempts to use such peer-to-peer forums to discuss issues of a global nature directly contradict paragraph 4 of Article 1 of the UN Charter, which sets out the need, "to ensure the role of the UN as a center for coordinating actions in achieving common goals."
Contrary to this principle, several years ago France and Germany proclaimed an alliance of multilateralists, into which they also invited only those who are obedient, which in itself again confirms the reluctance to get rid of the colonial mentality, and the attitude of the initiators to the principle of effective multilateralism, which is on our agenda today.
At the same time, the idea of the European Union as the ideal of that same multilateralism was inculcated.
There are now calls from Brussels to expand the EU's membership as soon as possible, including, in particular, the Balkan countries.
But the main pathos is not about Serbia, not about Turkey, which have been conducting hopeless negotiations on joining the EU for decades, but about Ukraine.
Claiming to be an ideologist of Euro-integration, Borrell recently did not hesitate to speak out that the Kiev regime should be accepted into the European Union as soon as possible.
Allegedly, if not for the war, this would have taken years, but this can and should be done without any criteria.
Serbia, Turkiye and others will wait.
And Ukraine needs to be admitted into the European Union out of turn.
By the way, at the same Summit for Democracy, the Secretary General declared:
"Democracy stems from the UN Charter. The first words of the UN Charter - we the peoples - reflect the fundamental source of legitimacy: the consent of those under control."
It is useful to correlate this thesis with the track record of the Kiev regime, which launched a war against a huge part of its own people, against those millions of people who did not consent to govern themselves to neo-Nazis and Russophobes who illegally seized power in the country and buried the Minsk agreements approved by the UN Security Council, thereby undermining territorial integrity of Ukraine.
For those who, contrary to the UN Charter, divide humanity into democracies and autocracies, it would not hurt them to answer the question of which category they classify the Ukrainian regime in?
I'm not expecting an answer.
Speaking about the principles of the UN Charter, the question arises about the relationship of the Security Council with the General Assembly.
The Western collective has been aggressively and for a long time pushing the topic of abuse of the veto right, and, through not entirely correct pressure on other UN members, it achieved a decision that after each use of this right, which the West is increasingly deliberately provoking, the corresponding topic should be considered at the General Assembly.
This does not pose any problem for us.
Because Russia’s approaches to all issues on the agenda are open, we have nothing to hide, and it is not difficult for us to state this position again.
In addition, the use of the veto is an absolutely legitimate tool provided for in the UN Charter in order to prevent the adoption of decisions that would be fraught with a split in the Organization.
But, if the procedure for discussing cases of the use of the veto at the General Assembly is approved, then why not think about those Security Council resolutions that were not vetoed, which were adopted, including many years ago, but which are never implemented, notwithstanding the provisions of Article 25 of the UN Charter.
Why doesn't the General Assembly consider the reasons for this state of affairs, for example, with regard to Security Council resolutions on Palestine, and on the entire range of problems of the Middle East and North Africa, on the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action, as well as on resolution 22-02, which approved the Minsk agreements on Ukraine.
The problem associated with sanctions regimes also requires attention.
It has already become the norm that the Security Council, after lengthy negotiations, in strict accordance with the UN Charter, approves sanctions against a specific country, and then the United States and its allies impose additional so-called unilateral restrictions against the same state, which have not received approval in the Security Council and are not included in its resolution as part of the agreed package.
In this same series, there is another glaring example: this is the decision just taken by Berlin, Paris and London, through their national legislation, to extend the restrictions on Iran that expire in October, which are subject to legal termination in accordance with resolution 22-31.
That is, European countries and Britain say that the Security Council decision has expired, but they don’t care about this, they have their own rules.
All this makes it more urgent to consider the issue of ensuring that after the Security Council adopts any sanctions resolution, none of the UN members would have the right to devalue it by introducing their own illegitimate restrictions against the same country.
It is also important that all sanctions regimes through the Security Council be time-limited, since their open-ended nature deprives the Council of flexibility in terms of influencing the policies of sanctioned governments.
The topic of the so-called humanitarian limits of sanctions also requires attention.
It would be right that henceforth the introduction of any sanctions projects to the Security Council would be accompanied by the provision of assessments of their consequences for citizens through UN humanitarian agencies, and not by demagogic statements from Western colleagues that ordinary people will not suffer.
Dear Colleagues.
The facts speak of a deep crisis in international relations and a lack of desire and will in the West to overcome this crisis.
But I hope that a way out of the current situation still exists, and it will be found.
To begin with, everyone needs to realize responsibility for the fate of our Organization, and for the fate of the world in a historical context, and not from the point of view of opportunistic electoral and momentary alignments in the next national elections of a particular member state.
Let me remind you again: almost 80 years ago, by signing the UN Charter, world leaders agreed to respect the sovereign equality of all states, large and small, rich and poor, monarchies and republics.
In other words, even then humanity recognized the need for an equal, polycentric world order as a guarantee of the sustainability and security of its development.
Therefore, today we are not talking about submitting to some kind of rules based world order, but we are talking about fulfilling by everyone the obligations assumed when signing and ratifying the UN Charter in its entirety and interconnection.
Thank you for attention.
25 August 2023
I have always maintained there is a third secret force intervening in Russia - Ukraine war to escalate it ! Drone attacks, missile falling in Poland etc ! Is it Turkey or AlQuida? Or Nato doing covertly ? Wagner Chiefs plane crash is part of that ! Putin wont hit him at this juncture !
21 August 2023
1. The Ukraine war is revealing a jarring fact: The US set out to bleed Russia, only to discover that its capacity to manufacture critical munitions does not compare well with that of Russia. US stocks of munitions are running low just when PRC's threat against Taiwan looms larger. https://twitter.com/Chellaney/status/1693319795725275190
2. PUTIN (2014): "Like a mirror, the situation in Ukraine reflects what is going on and what has been happening in the world over the past several decades. After the dissolution of bipolarity on the planet, we no longer have stability... Our western partners, led by the United States of America, prefer not to be guided by international law in their practical policies, but by the rule of the gun.
They have come to believe in their exclusivity and exceptionalism, that they can decide the destinies of the world, that only they can ever be right. They act as they please: they use force against sovereign states, building coalitions based on the principle “If you are not with us, you are against us.”
To make this aggression look legitimate, they force the necessary resolutions from international organizations, and if for some reason this does not work, they simply ignore the UN Security Council and the UN overall." https://twitter.com/upholdreality/status/1693294181412663593
13 August 2023
"Meanwhile, the grinding nature of the Ukraine war shows that it has reached a stalemate on the battlefield, with neither side in a position to make significant advances, let alone achieve total victory." https://thehill.com/opinion/international/4143408-bidens-ukraine-strategy-is-failing/
22 June 2023
Pioneer News Information
Hello to you all from the new part of the Russia-Ukraine daily map update report. The counteroffensive launched by Ukraine in recent days continues unabated. According to the latest reports, the Ukrainian army's counterattack continues in four sectors, including the Zaporizhia front line. The losses of the Russian army are increasing day by day. Let's examine the latest attacks on the front line together on the map.
Let's start our map report today with the latest developments in the city of Bakhmut. The clashes in Bakhmut city continue uninterruptedly. In the Bakhmut sector, where the clashes intensified, Berkhivka is witnessing quite remarkable developments. As you can see on the map, Berkhivka is about 8 kilometers from Bakhmut. This city is of great importance for the siege of Bakhmut north.
In recent days, many local sources have reported that Ukrainian special forces personnel have been conducting intensive operations in the Berkhivka countryside. According to unconfirmed reports, the Ukrainian army managed to penetrate several Russian positions in the areas east of the city center.
The Ukrainian army's operational strategy in Bakhmut is based on a phased offensive plan. Under this strategy, Ukrainian troops first capture positions where Russian troops are deployed. Then the offensive slows down for a while. During this time, the Ukrainian army prepares to achieve its other objectives and ensure full control of the positions they have captured. The information that the captured positions are fortified with the latest technology ammunition in the inventory of the Ukrainian army is among the information shared by local sources.
19 June 2023
President #Putin: All the problems in Ukraine were conceived after a state non-constitutional armed and bloody coup in 2014, which was supported by Western sponsors. 
They were pretty much open about this. And this coup is the source of power of the current leaders in Kiev.
They were pretty much open about this. And this coup is the source of power of the current leaders in Kiev.11 June 2023
Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky tacitly acknowledged for the first time Saturday that his forces had launched a highly anticipated counteroffensive against invading Russian troops, as the fighting intensified in eastern and southern Ukraine.
22 May 2023
For peace and neutrality - people march on the streets where ever it is possible/allowed.
https://twitter.com/RT_com/status/166043530779842969622 May 2023
Ukrainian war as per DW news. Destruction of men, machines, and materials by the foolishness of believing territory is an identity. Humanity must forget their identity and think that the world belongs to them. The world can be owned by Chinese, Americans, Russians, or capitalists. It does not matter who rules the society. Important is that there is no war and no destruction of mankind. Humanity must try to arrange food, shelter, and clothing for everyone. Leaders including leaders of G-20 must think of the prosperity and happiness of their citizens and must avoid war. War should not be politics by other means. Come out in each country and say "No war". "Please end the war and think beyond". Still it is possible to rebuild Ukraine. Nothing is lost till now. Future wars may be more destructive for Ukraine, Russia, and Europe. This fire may engulf America, China, India, Australia, and Argentina later, but no one may be safe if the flames of the fire are not quenched.
India, Taiwan, and other countries must understand that the war is not a solution. All should try to avoid war in their territories. Europeans including Russians may suffer again if war continues.
12 May 2023
I agree with Trump that this is not the time to say that Putin is a war criminal. We should try our best to stop the war and minimize destruction of men and material.
25 April 2023
Russia Foreign Minister Lavrov at UN Security Council: "Against the backdrop of the hysteria whipped up by the United States and the European Union, I would like to ask in contrast: what did Washington and NATO do in Yugoslavia, Iraq, Libya? Were there threats to their security, culture, religion, languages? What multilateral norms were they guided by, declaring the independence of Kosovo in violation of OSCE principles, destroying the stable economically prosperous states of Iraq and Libya, located ten thousand miles from the American coast?" https://twitter.com/upholdreality/status/1650538902648762375
Russia FM Lavrov chairs UN Security Council: "What were the US and NATO doing in Yugoslavia? In Iraq? In Libya? Were there threats there to their security, their culture, their religions, their languages?
What were the multilateral norms that guided them in their proclamations of the independence of Kosovo and the violation of the principles of the OSCE, in the destruction of the economically stable states of Iraq and Libya which collapsed as a result of their actions? These were places located thousands of miles from US shores." https://twitter.com/upholdreality/status/1650535196637163523
22 April 2023
.png)
How Ukraine war tending to be world war III - US military leaders pledge support to Ukraine - informed in this TV news. How can the people stop world war III? The end of war cannot be known. Democracy may win but at what costs? Is the second Mahabharat ready to happen? Groups are being made - either support Kaurav or Pandav? People around the world must think beyond to minimize the effects of war. "US Military Leaders Pledge Support For Ukraine For 'As Long As It Takes' | US Ukraine News LIVE
U.S. Defence Secretary Lloyd Austin and Joint Chiefs of Staff Gen. Mark Milley hold a news conference following a regular meeting with counterparts from Western allies on military aid to Ukraine." https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oyHP3NR-8q42. Volodymyr Zelensky has a long wish-list – NATO membership, more weapons & a Latin America summit. But Ukraine’s President is struggling to rope in new allies. Palki Sharma tells you why https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ptmI62lcAiY
"Democracy now" informs that west is involved in Ukraine war as per the leaked information of Pantagon.
20 March 2023
18 April 2023
1. Every day in the frontline cities of eastern Ukraine is a gamble. Rockets and artillery shells hit all the time. And yet, there are people who are staying, and their reasons for taking that risk are complex. DW’s Max Zander joined an evacuation team of the Ukrainian police as they went to a frontline town.
People living in Ukraine where fighting is going on say that they will live here and die here. It is their land and donot want to leave the area. They blamed both leaders and said we all were living here peacefully and these people spoiled our lives. Many people living in that area sup[port Russia before 2014 and till today. Press reporters donot want to critisize west openly, though people living in that area think differently.
2. Recently leaked top-secret documents from the United States suggest that Ukraine is struggling with supplies, and could run out of air defensive missiles within weeks.
Air marshal Edward Stringer, former director-general of Joint Force Development Strategic Command, says that Ukrainian forces need to demonstrate that they can seize the initiative in any coming spring counteroffensive against Russia.
Western Europe has not "stepped up" when it comes to increasing munitions production and has not built enough of a "defense industrial base" to counter Russian aggression in the long term, he added
This leak proves that NATO personnel were fighting along with Ukrainians in Ukraine.
22 March 2023
Ukraine war is percolating to new borders. As per the report of Zee News USA, U.K., and Canada are not taking any actions against people who took took actions to Indian embassies.
"4 पश्चिमी देशों ने किया भारत पर बड़ा हमला, उड़ा दी गई धज्जियां | Western countries attack India |
अचानक 4 बड़े देशों की तरफ से भारत पर हमले शुरू हो गए हैं. ये हमले इतने खतरनाक है की इन देशों में मौजूद भारतीय दूतावासों को भी नहीं छोड़ा गया. ये देश है अमेरिका, ब्रिटेन, कनाडा और ऑस्ट्रेलिया . इन देशों से एक साथ मुकाबला करना आसान बात नहीं है लेकिन भारत ने पूरी ताकत लगाकर इन्हे इनकी हैसियत दिखानी शुरू कर दी है. क्या है ये पूरा मामला जानिए इस वीडियो में..."
22 March 2023
The US says it wants to defend peace, but the world has yet to see any US effort meant for peace, particularly as it continues to pour weapons into the battlefield. https://twitter.com/CGMeifangZhang/status/1638167137880604672
22 March 2023
Freezing the direct violence via a ceasefire, allows us to work on the underlying conflicts.
Please stop meaning violence when you say conflict. It’s really just a small semantic step for both man & woman, but it really is a giant leap for humanity & biota (both kind & unkind).
21 March 2023
Uphold realaity twitter account informs in his tweet
CHINA MFA SPOKESMAN: : The US decision to wage the Iraq War was based on a lie. The war wreaked havoc on Iraq and the Middle East, and had a devastating impact on world peace and stability. The lessons are profound, which warrant deep reflection by the US and vigilance from the entire world.
21 March 2023
Hegemonism must be firmly rejected. The Iraq War was provoked by the US entirely to serve its geopolitical agenda, costing the region and the whole world dearly and fully revealed the truth and enormous perils of US hegemony. Countries need to jointly say no to hegemonism by taking firmer and stronger action against it, to make sure that never again will a country’s sovereignty be violated on the ground of baseless lies and allegations, and never again will any country be bullied and denied its right to development.
The international rule of law must be firmly defended. The US waged the war against a sovereign state without the mandate of the UN Security Council, undermining the UN-centered international system and blatantly trampling on the basic norms of international relations underpinned by the purposes and principles of the UN Charter. Facts have proven that the “rules-based international order”, which bypasses the UN and international law, is just another way of sugarcoating the “might-is-right” approach and the law of the jungle. Only by keeping the UN firmly at the center of the international system and upholding the basic norms governing international relations can we end the frequent occurrence of the strong bullying the weak and the big bullying the small.
The right of all countries to independently explore their democratic institutions and development paths must be earnestly respected. Facts have proven time and again that a country’s democratic institution and development path cannot be imposed externally, but explored and developed by the country’s own people. Peddling one’s own model of democracy in the name of democracy is in itself undemocratic. It is concerning that the US clearly has not learned the lessons of the Iraq War, for it has since gone into the conflicts in Syria and Libya and continued to peddle US model of democracy across the world. There is reason to ask: who will pay for US hegemony in the next 20 years?"
21 March 2023
Zhang Meifang张美芳 on Twitter: "I look forward to working with President Putin to jointly adopt a new vision, a new blueprint & new measures for the growth of China-Russia comprehensive strategic partnership of coordination in the years to come: President Xi in a signed article published on Russian media on Mon https://t.co/FYwR4vL1ht" / Twitter It is a twitter account for the news of Chinese government -
Zee news informs about Ukraine Mariupol on the visit of Putin on 19 March 2023. This report informs the main reasons for the Ukraine war. Once you visit the city of war destruction and visit hospitals one may understand the destruction caused by war.
1. Russians living in Ukraine were mistreated by Ukrainians. People with a Nazi mentality kidnapped Russians for 8 years and used to torture Russians. Azhok Bataliaan mistreated the Russians. It was not a regular Ukrainian army.
2. This army took shelter in the houses of civilians and in the tunnel of certain industries.
3. Many Russian language speaking were also fighting against these brigades supported by the Ukrainian government.
This is the main reason for the destruction of Ukraine's other cities.
6 March 2023
Sky news informs that 
"West (UK and others) is providing intelligence to Ukraine and Ukraine targets Russian soldiers."
"West (UK and others) is providing intelligence to Ukraine and Ukraine targets Russian soldiers."
5 March 2023
Russian Foreign Minister dresses down United States, Ukraine over war lecture; why silence on Iraq, Afghanistan ------ Hindustan Times Video 5:07 dated 4 March 2023.
"Vladimir Putin's top minister gives a fierce retort to the West and Ukraine over the ongoing war while speaking at the Raisina Dialogue in New Delhi. Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov used Iraq and Afghanistan as examples to slam the U.S. and said that if Washington has the right to defend its national interests, then so do we or any other country. Lavrov also gave a sharp reply on the peace process, saying, "Why is everyone asking only Russia? Ask Zelensky when he is going to negotiate.' Remember, Russia says it is willing to negotiate with Ukraine, but on its own terms."
World War III is knocking on humanity's doors.
24 February 2023
India at the United Nation General Assembly called for global peace and security on February 24. As the day marks a year of the Russia-Ukraine disastrous war, Permanent Representative of India to the UN, Ruchira Kamboj stated why India abstained from the UN vote to Ukraine and also pointed out its help to earthquake-hit Turkey. She said, “We are providing humanitarian support to Ukraine and some of its neighbours in the global south under economic distress even as they stare at the accelerating costs of food, fuel and fertilizers which has been a consequential fall out of the ongoing conflict”
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ciysiQOCZ-Y
The conflict between Russia and Ukraine that started escalating from the annexation of Crimea by Russia in 2014, blew up into a raging fire in 2022 with the Russian invasion. As the "special military operation" dragged on for months and transformed into a full fledged war, clear fault lines emerged in the world. The war split the world into separate blocks; those who support Ukraine, those who support Russia & those who choose to walk the fine line of balance, or non-committal approach.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NEQpKSwf2cs
यूक्रेन पर रूस की ओर से पहला हमला 24 फरवरी 2022 को किया गया था...इसके बाद दोनों देशों के बीच ताबड़तोड़ जंग जारी है...एक से बढ़कर एक घातक हथियारों का इस्तेमाल करके लगातार बारूदी कहर बरपाया जा रहा है...एक साल से जारी इस युद्ध में अब तक 42 हजार मौत हो चुकी हैं...57 हजार से ज्यादा लोग घायल हुए हैं
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oilq5-_ZVnI
रूस और यूक्रेन की जंग को आज एक साल पूरे हो गए हैं. 24 फरवरी 2022 को रूस के राष्ट्रपति व्लादिमीर पुतिन ने यूक्रेन के खिलाफ जंग का ऐलान किया था. इस एक साल में जंग किसी नतीजे पर नहीं पहुंची है. न कोई जीता है. न कोई हारा है. लेकिन इस जंग का असर सिर्फ इन दो देशों ही नहीं, बल्कि दुनियाभर पर पड़ा है. श्वेता सिंह के साथ देखें ये रिपोर्ट. Abhay Kumar Singh - Putin's Party person clarifies my doubt that NATO is not only helping militarily but soldiers of NATO are also taking part after wearing Ukraine's soldier's dress.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bzZMq5XZLg4 AAj Tak 9:14
The war started today between Russia and Ukraine. But even after completion of one year, neither Russian President Putin is taking the name of bowing down nor Ukrainian President Zelensky. Know how much damage has been done in both the countries so far. 141 Voted in favour of resolution of UNGA, 7 opposed it and 32 abstained including Russia and China (6:40).
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8w6CVhgZa_0 Zee News 8:01 24 February 2023.
Sky news informs and shows that Ukraine is asking all the nations of the world to supply weapons and people.
"The UK defence secretary says Typhoon fighter jets will not be sent to Ukraine in the immediate future. But Ben Wallace added: "The one thing I have learnt in this conflict is you can't rule anything in and rule anything out." He also said the UK was ramping up arms production and was not worried about the state of UK stockpiles. Sky's Deborah Haynes reported on Thursday that Whitehall sources had told her defences bosses were concerned that the UK had miscalculated how much ammunition was needed to fight modern wars."
22 February 2023
Newshub of New Zealand discusses this in a series of videos. It is a fight between the Western powers and Russia. Very soon it shall be a direct fight between old unipolar power and new emerging powers. World war and Atomic war are just around the corner. United Nations failed. Russia and China are challenging US. A new cold war may replace war to minimize atomic destruction.
1.
.png)
Ukraine - A Year of War - The Drums of War - Newshub Investigates 4:59 Part I https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=K9UipG4AhU0&t=126s
2. Fear of war - People are taking shelter.
.png)
Ukraine A Year of War - The Invasion - Newshub Investigates 6:29 Part II https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Lew9IBoSJKU&t=179s
3. Destruction of war in Ukraine
.png)
Ukraine A Year of War - The Horror - Newshub Investigates 4:48 Part III https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=P7ZxsVnhuU8&t=141s
4. Cost of war and politics of elites.
.png)
Ukraine A Year of War - Hitting Home Newshub investigates 3:10 Part IV https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0XxnrNZAz0w&t=31s
5. Gain of war is still ambiguous.
.png)
A Year od War - How does this end - a Documentary The Drums of War. 4:16 Part V https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Cn446nu-2N4&t=27s
6. Cost of war and Ego of politics
.png)
Ukraine - A Year of War - Introduction - Newshub Investigates 1:03 It has been a devastating year of war in Ukraine. Cost of war is uncountable. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QkBJbsOzeiQ
7. People are crying and suffering. But politicians are egoists.
.png)
Ukraine - A Year of War - Full Documentary 24:45 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=em6X29zak9Y&t=418s
8.
.png)
9..png)
Biden promises all help to Ukraine against dictators..png)
Biden is in Poland. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=V-TAk2z0jIk
.png)
Biden promises all help to Ukraine against dictators.
.png)
10.
Street fight in Bakhmut. Many Ukrainians are suffering due to political decisions. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0uBgtVQBAKA
20 February 2023
China Col explains the war in Ukraine. Sovereignty is important. But the expansion of NATO threatens Russia's integrity. "Former Chinese Senior Military Colonel Zhou Bo told DW's Richard Walker at this year's MSC that although the war in Ukraine was "not in China's interest," it also was not an issue Beijing could solve. "War in the heart of Europe has nothing to do with China," he said. "This war is not in China's interest. If it would stop immediately, we would be very happy." Zhou added that it was wrong for Western politicians to blame Russian President Vladimir Putin for the invasion of Ukraine, saying that Russia "took this action because of NATO expansion and Russian leaders have been talking about this since the Soviet time." He also said that since China and Russia share a long border, it was in both countries' interests to ensure they had a "good and stable" relationship."
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cHOvEE1Y230
16 February 2023
.png)
19 January 2023
Poland fears world war III if Ukraine is defeated by Russia.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2Oed4WUSWus
Just Napolean united all against Russia, the same way the US is trying to unite all against Russia. Russian foreign minister Lavrov compares the West's approach to Russia with Hitler's Final Solution to the Jewish problem. Napoleon also united against Russia. Listen to it. Trade between Russia and China increased. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4nUeuEF4-Ss
Jaipal Datta in West Berlin with Richter family of Berlin from Poland and Germany - year 1970
People, bloggers, academics, and historians write the will of victor and financiers. The war between Ukraine and Russia informs and confirms my hypothesis, though academics are divided on the issue. Each academic and historian may write according to the eyeglasses they wear.
Germany's foreign minister, Annalena Baerbock, says, "Russia's war in Ukraine can cause problems in the coming winter as Russia has already bombarded the energy infrastructures of Ukraine. Many may die in Europe and Ukraine if this continues because houses may not be heating."
Is the integrity of a nation's territory and sovereignty more important than humanity's life? Why should Germany suffer again and again?
Westfalian system believed that independent states must refrain from interference in each other's domestic affairs. Did political leaders act as per agreed rules? Why do some states interfere in other's states? Why do politicians support rebels in unfriendly countries and create unrest? Why do politicians of one ideology wage war against another? Was the Westfalian system accepted in toto? Do Westfalian commitment valid today? Internet and social media percolated and diffused many national boundaries. Westfalian system needs change as United Nations Organizations failed to act impartially.
World war III may confirm that the reasons for war differ from what many people understand. It leads to one central question. That is, what should the new system be for peace and prosperity? War should be avoided at any cost to avoid the suffering of humanity. The territory is not essential as today.
Russia has warned and discussed all issues before attacking Ukraine. Though some think differently. The War industry is manipulating the conflict. Many states have started training young people for war.
According to me, as of today's knowledge, a Unipolar world with multipolarity of regional polarity is the best solution under democratic capitalistic practices with a reasonable welfare system. Let each culture modify democratic constitutions and rules of their states. Each family accepts different norms to live together and in peace. War (direct or indirect) is not a solution for humanity.
Read also:
