Will Kashmir break India or Pakistan? (Yugoslavia was broken into six nations by Muslims)

How many times will India and Pakistan fight war? Will it be the last war?

History informs that Muslim invaders were defeated 17 times. Hindu Raja forgave 17 times Muslims invaders. 18th time when Hindu King was defeated, then he was killed by a Muslim invader. Will history repeat?

Many may like that there should be war and may get profit from this war. But many, including many Kashmiris, will be killed. So I wish Muslim leaders will understand and behave cautiously. The media may talk good or bad and may confuse the people. Academics and NGOs may confuse legal and human rights language. But one must learn lessons from China, Russia, the US, England, Germany, and France.

ISI of Pakistan is financed by the Pakistan army. Federally Administered Tribal Area (FATA) of Pakistan and their Jirgas were killed by Pak Army or supporters of Pak army. Indian media was and are silent on this issue. Does Imran Khan know that? Will he react?  Can he control the army? Time will tell.

I am using the Muslim words as many Mehbooba Kashmiri asked other Muslims to unite and help Kashmiris. Dr. Farooq Abdullah is still criticizing and agrees that he and his party shall follow peaceful measures and go to court.  He said with deep emotions, "We are not stone pelters. We are not bombing throwers."

 It is a known fact in the literature that there are rogue states, and these states belong to some Muslim states. Pakistan is spoiling the name of Muslims as it is known as a terrorist training area. Some Muslim states are good, but the Pak army is not interested in peace.

 Many Muslims in Pakistan want war. Pak may think that Pak can change the tide and use Kashmiri people in favor of war.

 India is a democratic country. Pakistan is not democratic. What may happen? Will Pakistan divide like Yugoslavia?

                                                       Map of Jammu and Kashmir

  The problem is only in two districts of Kashmir. Many areas of Jammu and Kashmir support the abrogation of articles 370 and 35A. Ladakh and Jammu area supports BJP. Bill is passed by two-thirds majority in Indian parliament lower and upper house.

Some known Lutiyans supporting Pakistan ideology. With this move of Modi, it may be more transparent where these Lutiyans stand? Will they behave like Jaichand or Vibhishan?

Pakistan is not accepting abrogation of article 370 and says that it is unconstitutional. Pak is getting ready to start a war. Al Jazeera. According to the report 4 times, India and Pak fought a war to solve the issue of Kashmir. Pakistan and Mehbooba Mufti calling Jihad by Muslims against India. How will Indian  Muslims react?

Will India start a war of religion as propagated by Huntington's clash of civilizations? Will China and Russia support India?

The international community can interfere if Pakistan starts a war. No state can interfere in the internal matters of other states. This is what Imran Khan knows, and he knows that war is not good for Kashmir, Pakistan, and India. Pakistan also can not agree that complete Kashmir should be an independent state. Kashmiri people want "Pakistan Occupied Kashmir, China Occupied Kashmir and India occupied Kashmir should be an independent state." India, China, and Pakistan do not want to. That is how United Nations agreed to maintain the line of control.

Burkha and Al Jazeera are talking of Kashmiri Muslims. The media is silent on the people of Jammu and Ladakh. Does the International community think only about Muslims? Do they think that non-Muslims are not human beings? Al Jazeera must discuss the religious issue carefully.

The problem is not of land. The problem is that many sweepers (Safai Karam Chari) were not respected by Kashmiri Muslims. As a result, Kashmir violated the human rights of the non-Muslim working class and their families.

Problems that aggravated this situation:

•  No one could do any business in Kashmir, including Kashmiris, due to terrorists.
• Terrorism:  50000 people killed. Killing/ eviction/ rape of nearly one million Kashmiri pandits. Announcements were made in the name of Allah from Masjids.
• Kashmiri Pandit and many Muslims migrated to other parts of India to seek jobs and study due to terrorists' activities in Kashmir since the 1980s. 
•  Indians were paying taxes, and money was used by two-three Kashmiri families for their power and personal use.
• This money was used by terrorists to disturb the peace, and military operation was not cost-effective.
•  Many Muslims, including leaders, started feeling insecure because there was no rule of law in Kashmir. 
• The human rights of Kashmiri women were affected. For example, she could not marry as per her wishes.
•  Discrimination against Kashmiri women of JK, Dalits, OBCs, SC/STs.
• JK Bank was looted by these bureaucrats and politicians.
• Discrimination against the very people of Kashmir denying them the benefits of laws passed by the Indian Parliament.
• Buddhists were mistreated, and Ladakh was considered not Kashmir and part of J & K. as per MP of Ladakh.
• Pakistan gave Kashmiri land to China without permission from Kashmiri Muslims.
• The media says that peace will not come to Kashmir, but it may only kill Kashmiris. Foreign media is not talking of Ladakh and Jammu. They are talking of only Muslims. 
• Is Al Jazeera advocating unrest in India? 
• Human rights were violated by the JK government.
• Politicians were wealthy and corrupt. Leaders and their supporters acted like the mafia and looted poor Kashmiris.

As anticipated, NDTV and Lutiyans advocate that the government's decision is wrong, and no discussion has occurred. They agree that terrorist activities are justified. According to them, seventy years, all leaders were useless, and no discussions with Kashmiris or Pakistan took place.

 Many arguments can be given by many people. But the governor of nations knows what is good and what is bad. So Modi is elected by not only Hindus as it is propagated by many but also by many Muslims also.
CNBC Awaz. also informs the same.
Lallantop informs details. Kashmir is India's internal matter.
ABP news informs what is going on in the Pak assembly about Kashmir.
Owasi - It is the third mistake India is committing.

With this move of Modi Pak and supporters of Pak can not advocate indirectly undercover. So now it will be clear who supports India, democracy, and secularism and supports Muslim Shria and Pak-sponsored terror? Who wants to destabilize India?

These are totally my personal views. If there is any mistake in my understanding and it is not correct, please inform me at jdat045@aucklanduni.ac.nz. Please note I am still a student of master of conflict and terrorism studies. However, I am improving my expression power.

Ashok Malik informs benefits which I wrote on Facebook on 8 August 2019. These are as explained by Malik is mentioned below but more clearly explained by MP of Ladakh in his speech in Parliament.

Ashok Malik explains the gains of abrogation of article 370. An essay is well written with 3500 words explaining the history and why this action was required. I am reproducing only the benefits of the removal of this article.

"The removal of Article 370 makes laws of the Union of India automatically applicable in Jammu-Kashmir. As a result, facilities provided in the rest of the country to disadvantaged communities and groups – from women to religious minorities to historically underprivileged castes – will become relevant to Jammu-Kashmir. The removal of Article 35A, for instance, will make it possible for a permanent resident to marry an outsider and yet pass on inherited property to their children. So far, this was a right denied to women permanent residents who married non-natives.

There are other examples. Partition-era Punjabi (largely Sikh) refugees from areas now in Pakistan settled in Jammu in 1947. Today this community is over 100,000-strong. Thus far, they have not been granted permanent resident status and have no domicile rights. They voted in parliamentary elections, but not assembly elections. They could not buy property or access higher education quotas. In contrast, Muslim refugees from Xinjiang and Tibet, who arrived in Srinagar in the 1950s, were completely integrated into Kashmiri society after annexing their homelands by communist China." Ashok Malik, one of my friends.

Kashmir under siege informed Forbes.
Imran Khan says that BJP is acting like Nazi Party. BJP wants to change the demography.