Tuesday 10 December 2019

Citizenship Amendment Bill (CAB) High lights



CAB passed in Lok Sabha and Rajya Sabha. Amit Shah answers all questions in his final speech in Rajya Sabha. Details can be read in the following paragraphs.

Citizenship Amendment Bill (CAB) speech in Parliament by Amit Shah on December 9, 2019, informed by BBC. He informed that it is useful to minorities. Every country has a Citizenship act. No civilized country allows people to migrate inside their territories without any rule. United States, Canada, Europe and Russia, China do not allow illegal migration. India is now ratifying citizenship rules and copying civilized democratic countries. Northeast states are affected the most due to migration from Bangladesh. Muslims from Pakistan and other countries migrated to many states of India to change the demography of India.

Rajya Sabha TV informs the history of CAB. Migrants, who came as illegal into India, including overstayed without legal papers, shall be regularized with due diligence. Minorities coming from Pakistan, Afghanistan, Bangladesh, and Myanmar shall be considered. Northeast states have been exempted. It was necessary to protect minority or tribal areas of the Northeast. It is not based on religion as advocated by Muslim leader Owaisi.

India has always accepted Jews, Tibetan, and African migrants. It was a necessity depending on the new international rules and regulations. Classification has been discussed by a parliamentary committee. Muslims from Pakistan, Bangladesh, and Afghanistan may not be considered. Already nine amendments have been passed by parliament.


The Lallantop informs about the CAB bill. CAB is about six religions like Hindu, Sikh, Christian, Parsi, Jain, and Budh living as a minority in Pakistan, Bangladesh, Afghanistan. Will this CAB reduce the Muslim population? This is doubt created by Indian opposition parties. According to BJP, this was written in their election memorandum, and they got people's mandate. Persecuted minorities in these Muslim majority nations or theocratic nations will get preference. India should be the natural home of Hindus. In these countries, minorities are persecuted. Northeast is opposing based on the son of the soil policy, as many people migrated from Bangladesh. NRC and CAB are co-related.

CAB in parliament (1:11:51 Minutes). Act about Anglo Indians also.

Asaduddin Owaisi explained his views against the CAB bill. He informed that it is anti-Islam and ant Muslim. Why does the BJP government hate Muslims? He tore the bill in parliament. Why do the government afraid of China? If the Taliban from Pakistan and Afghanistan comes, then Government needs us. This act is made to divide India and asking for partition again. Due to you, there would be a division of India. This act shall be a failure by all means.

Opposition is informing against the bill. CAB is against constitution article 14.

Times Now News.Com writes, "CAB undermines basic tenet of democracy: US; Commission mulls sanctions against Shah." The Centre claims that Hindu, Sikh, Buddhist, Jain, Parsi, and Christian communities from these countries who have come to India till 31 December 2014 will be granted citizenship rights through the bill. Why did the US not allow migrants from some Muslim countries? Why should any country ban Muslims from migrating?

The US Commission on International Religious Freedom came down harshly on the bill's passage in the lower house of Parliament. It said that it is "a dangerous turn in the wrong direction."

This bill is not against Gandhi's family. Amit Shah explains in parliament. Five times this act is ratified. This bill is regarding security. It is not against the CAB bill or the Gandhi family.

In an interview with Rajdeep Sardesai, Lallan top informs that there is no opposition to Narender Bhai Modi and Amit Shah. Rahul Gandhi could not connect to the people of India. Modi and Shah have changed the political atmosphere of India. Now politics is competitive, and politicians have to compete with Modi. In states, BJP is losing. Haryana, Maharashtra could not win due to Modi. People distinguish elections of states and center. 

Some (Hindus coming from Pakistan)  are celebrating in favor of this bill.  It is being celebrated in New Delhi, Bhopal, Mumbai - Ulahas Nagar, and Jaipur about citizenship. People are explaining what difficulties illegal migrants are facing who were staying for more than twenty years. BBC informs about Hindu migrants coming from Pakistan. In Pakistan, as per the news, Hindus could not study, take water. Hindu women were not safe.

According to Hinduism, this amendment bill is unequal and unsecular. Hindu, dated 10 December 2019, writes, "A key argument against the CAB is that it will not extend to those persecuted in Myanmar and Sri Lanka, from where Rohingya Muslims and Tamils are staying in the country as refugees. Further, it fails to allow Shia and Ahmadiyya Muslims, who also face persecution, to apply for citizenship. The exemption from the application of the CAB’s provisions in tribal areas in Assam, Meghalaya, Mizoram, and Tripura, and the Inner Line Permit areas in Arunachal Pradesh, Nagaland, and Mizoram, with Manipur to be added soon, is clearly based on political expediency, even if it is in line with the constitutional guarantees given to indigenous populations and statutory protection given to ILP areas."

Many states are protesting. In Assam, many tires are burnt. Many Muslims migrated from Bangladesh. Illegal migrants Muslims may not get citizenship, while Hindus migrants may get citizenship. This may change the demography of Assam. Illegal Muslims are worried about their future. Many Muslims were migrating from Bangladesh and Pakistan. These Muslims supported Kashmir Muslims and took a stand with other Muslims of Pakistan and Kashmir. Secularism was used to favor Muslims by Congress, particularly during the Sonia Congress period.  

Aajtak informs Dangal about CAB. Refugees are welcome but not illegal migrants. Muslims are discussing that Hindus and Christians, including Sikh, Jain, and Buddism, will get citizenship but not Muslims. It is regarding persecuted religious minority communities of Pakistan, Afghanistan, Pakistan. One should differentiate Muslims from theological countries. Nepal, Srilanka, Myanmar should also be included. India is divided based on religion. Pakistani Muslims should not be allowed as those Muslims are infiltrators and can cause regional problems.

Rajnaath Defence Minister informs that we are welcoming only persecuted religious minorities, not all persecuted. News India 18 informs that CAB is for Hindus, Jain, Buddhists, Christian, and Sikhs if persecuted in other theological countries. Why should Pakistan oppose this bill? Hindus were persecuted in Pakistan, and many minorities were killed or harassed in Pakistan.

CAB is not against Muslim citizens in India. 

Subhi Khan clarifies about CAB. India had always welcomed people from other nations. So why did Home Minister not allow Muslims to be taken as Citizens of India (legal or illegal Muslim migrants)."If Hindus and other minorities of Muslim countries can not be welcomed in India, then which country may give them citizenship?" The anchor asked the question. The question is, why did US religious groups object to it? But USCIRF (The US Commission for International Religious Freedom) is known for useless remarks as per the news.

Does CAB violate Article 14? The Indian Constitution does not allow favoritism to one religion. According to Amit Shah, it is not favoring one community. It is flavoring many communities like Sikh, Hindu, Christian, Jain, and Buddhism. As India was divided based on religion, this is the reason to allow Indian-origin minorities of theological notions. India always accepted secular vision (favoring equality and equity), but Pakistan never accepted it. As a result, Hindu minorities were reduced in Pakistan, Bangladesh, and Afghanistan.

The government is fulfilling BJP promises written in the BJP elections' manifesto before elections. BJP completes his manifesto one by one (37:34): Talak, Article 370, CAB, etc. According to UNHCR (37:35) graph is shown of migrants in India. 

Highlights of CAB explained by HINDU newspaper in video enclosed.

RSTV Vishesh informs in detail about Citizenship rules and regulations, including amendments. It is based on family (Vansh), not based on territory. Why was Committee formed, and why were there amendments in the Citizenship act.

NDTV analyses CAB. It clarifies about Muslims. Muslim citizens will not be affected. Supreme court advocate Mr. Nigam explained in detail.

Times now explains in the Twitter account the legal nature of CAB. Constitution expert explains. Wire explains something else for Rohingya and something else for persecuted minorities of three neighboring countries. Orange Wire explains CAB differently. Twitter explains again that CAB was passed by Rajya Sabha also. So it differentiates discrimination by Congress and BJP.

The author informs after events after CAB passed in Parliament with the majority.

The Wire, NDTV, and the Quint newspapers and TV channels are opposing. To be more specific, these channels are showing that Muslims are opposing this CAB. These are the same Lutyan channels that were declared corrupt and anti-national. 

Let us understand more in detail. 

After the abrogation of Article 370 - Imran Khan called all Muslims to unite and stand with the Kashmiris. Mufti Mehbooba (PDP) also called all Muslims of India to support Kashmiris against abrogation of article 370. Muslims in India demonstrated against this bill. The demonstration is a civil right in the Indian democracy. Nothing wrong with this. But once the mob is violent, there should be law and order; otherwise, the government fails to protect citizens' lives and property. If there is violence by the mob, then there is violence by the government. Violence can be resolved by democratic means and by following the laws of the land. Democracy is the only solution to accept laws passed by majority and majority not by one vote but by two-thirds. 

The majority approved CAB and abrogation of article 370. Does it mean that the Indian government should always accept minority struggle if there is violence used by minorities? Make it more clear. Does it mean that the Indian government should appease Muslim leaders to avoid conflict or violence? I disagree. I believe that violence by any party may beget violence. Democracy provides means to solve the conflict by-elections, and it is important to win in the elections and then pass rules as per the people's verdict. What can happen in India if Muslims unite due to India's call and the World Unite against the democratically elected governments and take the law into their hands? I assume that China, Russia, Turkey, and Muslim nations may support their movement to support the wishes of their citizens. 

Knowing what happened in Gujarat once Muslims burned the Karsewak train at Godhara, India will burn for some days like the partition of 1947. Muslims, Christians, and Hindus must understand. This bill is not against Muslims. But yes, this bill is against Muslims coming from PAKISTAN, BANGLADESH, AND AFGHANISTAN and staying in India illegally. This is the right given to all nations to protect their people and select whom to allow or not allow. Muslims must understand. I am knowingly not using the words minority to clearly understand what is good and what is bad and what can happen later, in my opinion. I was congress till Indira Gandhi, and my affiliation extended till Rajive Gandhi. I lost respect for all politicians, including BJP, till Modi was elected to power. Now I am supporting BJP and BJP led by Modi only, including Yogi of UP. 

Hindustan Times ( Mohua  Mitra and Manish Tiwari ) are calling violence. India Today Group invited army Generals on this issue. India today is involving army people in discussions and creating a conflict between the army and politicians. Is India Group creating future generals to take over the political system of India? India Today Group should avoid this in the future. General Singh informs that it is the pull factor of India the people from Bangladesh coming to India. Around 28 million people are coming or will come to India. He says look at the larger side of the concept. NRC is required. Till now (72 years after independence - congress party), no action has been taken. Rahul editor wants to nib the problem at its bud. The terrain is difficult to watch. The population is similar on both sides. We can not divide the people living on both sides of the people in the northeast. Villages can not be partitioned as the partition of a village can not be divided. Tribes can not be divided. What is the solution? Identity card to be issued. But many tribes do not accept it. Tribes do not want border posts. They want to live together. These Generals explained about this, informing administrative matters. General says that we should complement the government, and Modi has taken the right decision. 

Retired Major General G.D.Bakshi informs that we should know why and how did we get freedom? If we do not understand the reality, we should know why we should fight? We got freedom due to Subhash Chander Bose. English reduced Indian forces from 25 Lacs to 3 lacs and then divided half to India and Pakistan. Congress's working committee elected Sardar Patel, but English conveyed to Mahatama Gandhi that Nehru is the right candidate.

Due to violence in Delhi by Jamia University Students or demonstrators or criminals in demonstration created violence and burnt many buses near Okhla. In a democracy, it will hurt elections. Demonstrations were not peaceful as planned. It is informed that many places in the Sukhdev Vihar metro station and Jamia area are also affected. Many DTC buses are burnt, and glasses have broken near Mathura road, Badarpur road area. CAB is not against Muslims Citizens but only against Muslims who overstayed in India. No democratic nation can allow illegal migrants and particularly uncounted citizens of a nation. In civilized democratic countries, migration is planned to thousand numbers or hundred numbers. Aaj Tak also confirms the same that demonstrators have burnt the buses. NDTV also informs that near the Jamia area, buses were burnt by demonstrators in the Jamia Milia University area, students were not involved. Many outsiders came as per NDTV and burnt the buses. Jamia area, Sukhdev Vihar, Friends Colony area were affected.
Al Jazeera also informs about violence. DW also informs about CAB as a clear message from the Hindu-dominated BJP. This bill shall not harm any Muslim. However, critics say that it is against Muslims.

Subramaniyam Swamy explains Hinduism and Hindu politics. He also explained about Imran Khan and about business with Pakistan. Many actions Modi can not do as he has to consider many more options. Pakistan should be divided into four parts. If Modi comes back again, then Modi can take action. (This report is dated 26 March 2019 before the 2019 general parliament election). Swamy explains about policies and about four passports of Rahul Gandhi and Sonia's previous history. 

Will Uniform Civil Code apply? What is wrong with applying the Uniform Civil Code? Muslims objected earlier. It can not be imposed. Is it a fundamental right? How is it against the constitution but written in the constitution? Freedom of religion is guaranteed by the constitution. Muslim law as practiced by Muslims in India is problematic (explained by Arif Khan). 

Sikhs and Hindus appreciate it as it was pending for many years BBC quotes.

Violence in Jamia due to CAB explained by Lallantop. Priyanka Gandhi decided to sit on dharna. 
India can not take many million illegal migrants.


No comments:

Post a Comment

You are welcome to write your thinking