Corruption is often observed as a huge problem preventing developing countries from sustainably addressing poverty. Do you agree? If so, what ought to be done about this issue?
21 June 2023
Rahul visited America before the visit of the Prime Minister of India and perhaps paid money to some brokers to influence the public and gain false popularity.
Excerpts from a letter addressed to President Biden by 75 US Senators & Members of Congress urging him to take up these issues with Prime Minister Narendra Modi. The Indian media will not show you this. But read the content to know why we as Indians should be worried. ‘𝐓𝐫𝐨𝐮𝐛𝐥𝐢𝐧𝐠 𝐬𝐢𝐠𝐧𝐬 𝐢𝐧 𝐈𝐧𝐝𝐢𝐚 𝐭𝐨𝐰𝐚𝐫𝐝 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐬𝐡𝐫𝐢𝐧𝐤𝐢𝐧𝐠 𝐨𝐟 𝐩𝐨𝐥𝐢𝐭𝐢𝐜𝐚𝐥 𝐬𝐩𝐚𝐜𝐞, 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐫𝐢𝐬𝐞 𝐨𝐟 𝐫𝐞𝐥𝐢𝐠𝐢𝐨𝐮𝐬 𝐢𝐧𝐭𝐨𝐥𝐞𝐫𝐚𝐧𝐜𝐞, 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐭𝐚𝐫𝐠𝐞𝐭𝐢𝐧𝐠 𝐨𝐟 𝐜𝐢𝐯𝐢𝐥 𝐬𝐨𝐜𝐢𝐞𝐭𝐲 𝐨𝐫𝐠𝐚𝐧𝐢𝐳𝐚𝐭𝐢𝐨𝐧𝐬 𝐚𝐧𝐝 𝐣𝐨𝐮𝐫𝐧𝐚𝐥𝐢𝐬𝐭𝐬, 𝐚𝐧𝐝 𝐠𝐫𝐨𝐰𝐢𝐧𝐠 𝐫𝐞𝐬𝐭𝐫𝐢𝐜𝐭𝐢𝐨𝐧𝐬 𝐨𝐧 𝐩𝐫𝐞𝐬𝐬 𝐟𝐫𝐞𝐞𝐝𝐨𝐦𝐬 𝐚𝐧𝐝 𝐢𝐧𝐭𝐞𝐫𝐧𝐞𝐭 𝐚𝐜𝐜𝐞𝐬𝐬.’ ‘𝐈𝐧𝐭𝐞𝐫𝐧𝐚𝐭𝐢𝐨𝐧𝐚𝐥 𝐑𝐞𝐥𝐢𝐠𝐢𝐨𝐮𝐬 𝐅𝐫𝐞𝐞𝐝𝐨𝐦 𝐢𝐧 𝐈𝐧𝐝𝐢𝐚 𝐝𝐞𝐭𝐚𝐢𝐥𝐬 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐰𝐨𝐫𝐫𝐢𝐬𝐨𝐦𝐞 𝐢𝐧𝐜𝐫𝐞𝐚𝐬𝐞 𝐨𝐟 𝐫𝐞𝐥𝐢𝐠𝐢𝐨𝐮𝐬 𝐢𝐧𝐭𝐨𝐥𝐞𝐫𝐚𝐧𝐜𝐞 𝐭𝐨𝐰𝐚𝐫𝐝 𝐦𝐢𝐧𝐨𝐫𝐢𝐭𝐢𝐞𝐬 𝐚𝐧𝐝 𝐫𝐞𝐥𝐢𝐠𝐢𝐨𝐮𝐬𝐥𝐲 𝐦𝐨𝐭𝐢𝐯𝐞𝐝 𝐯𝐢𝐨𝐥𝐞𝐧𝐜𝐞 𝐛𝐲 𝐛𝐨𝐭𝐡 𝐩𝐫𝐢𝐯𝐚𝐭𝐞 𝐚𝐧𝐝 𝐬𝐭𝐚𝐭𝐞 𝐚𝐜𝐭𝐨𝐫𝐬.’ ‘𝐈𝐧𝐝𝐢𝐚, 𝐚 𝐜𝐨𝐮𝐧𝐭𝐫𝐲 𝐭𝐡𝐚𝐭 𝐡𝐚𝐬 𝐛𝐞𝐞𝐧 𝐤𝐧𝐨𝐰𝐧 𝐢𝐧 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐩𝐚𝐬𝐭 𝐟𝐨𝐫 𝐢𝐭𝐬 𝐯𝐢𝐛𝐫𝐚𝐧𝐭 𝐚𝐧𝐝 𝐢𝐧𝐝𝐞𝐩𝐞𝐧𝐝𝐞𝐧𝐭 𝐩𝐫𝐞𝐬𝐬, 𝐡𝐚𝐬 𝐟𝐚𝐥𝐥𝐞𝐧 𝐬𝐢𝐠𝐧𝐢𝐟𝐢𝐜𝐚𝐧𝐭𝐥𝐲 𝐢𝐧 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐫𝐚𝐧𝐤𝐢𝐧𝐠𝐬 𝐟𝐨𝐫 𝐩𝐫𝐞𝐬𝐬 𝐟𝐫𝐞𝐞𝐝𝐨𝐦. 𝐀𝐧𝐝 𝐚𝐜𝐜𝐨𝐫𝐝𝐢𝐧𝐠 𝐭𝐨 𝐀𝐜𝐜𝐞𝐬𝐬 𝐍𝐨𝐰, 𝐈𝐧𝐝𝐢𝐚 𝐫𝐚𝐧𝐤𝐬 𝐟𝐢𝐫𝐬𝐭 𝐢𝐧 𝐭𝐞𝐫𝐦𝐬 𝐨𝐟 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐦𝐨𝐬𝐭 𝐢𝐧𝐭𝐞𝐫𝐧𝐞𝐭 𝐬𝐡𝐮𝐭𝐝𝐨𝐰𝐧𝐬 𝐟𝐨𝐫 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐟𝐢𝐟𝐭𝐡 𝐲𝐞𝐚𝐫 𝐢𝐧 𝐚 𝐫𝐨𝐰.’ ‘𝐖𝐞 𝐬𝐡𝐚𝐫𝐞 𝐚 𝐬𝐩𝐞𝐜𝐢𝐚𝐥 𝐛𝐨𝐧𝐝 𝐭𝐡𝐫𝐨𝐮𝐠𝐡 𝐦𝐨𝐫𝐚𝐥 𝐥𝐞𝐚𝐝𝐞𝐫𝐬 𝐰𝐡𝐨 𝐬𝐡𝐚𝐩𝐞𝐝 𝐨𝐮𝐫 𝐡𝐢𝐬𝐭𝐨𝐫𝐢𝐞𝐬. 𝐃𝐫. 𝐌𝐚𝐫𝐭𝐢𝐧 𝐋𝐮𝐭𝐡𝐞𝐫 𝐊𝐢𝐧𝐠, 𝐉𝐫, 𝐰𝐡𝐨 𝐠𝐚𝐯𝐞 𝐡𝐢𝐬 𝐥𝐢𝐟𝐞 𝐢𝐧 𝐩𝐮𝐫𝐬𝐮𝐢𝐭 𝐨𝐟 𝐛𝐮𝐢𝐥𝐝𝐢𝐧𝐠 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐛𝐞𝐥𝐨𝐯𝐞𝐝 𝐜𝐨𝐦𝐦𝐮𝐧𝐢𝐭𝐲 𝐡𝐞𝐫𝐞 𝐢𝐧 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐔𝐧𝐢𝐭𝐞𝐝 𝐒𝐭𝐚𝐭𝐞𝐬, 𝐰𝐚𝐬 𝐚𝐧 𝐚𝐫𝐝𝐞𝐧𝐭 𝐬𝐭𝐮𝐝𝐞𝐧𝐭 𝐨𝐟 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐭𝐞𝐚𝐜𝐡𝐢𝐧𝐠𝐬 𝐨𝐟 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐌𝐚𝐡𝐚𝐭𝐦𝐚 𝐆𝐚𝐧𝐝𝐡𝐢, 𝐤𝐧𝐨𝐰𝐧 𝐢𝐧 𝐈𝐧𝐝𝐢𝐚 𝐚𝐬 𝐭𝐡𝐞 “𝐅𝐚𝐭𝐡𝐞𝐫 𝐨𝐟 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐍𝐚𝐭𝐢𝐨𝐧”.’
https://twitter.com/SupriyaShrinate/status/1671218864116633600
Ms. @SupriyaShrinate
: It’s ok to be critical of your government - we do this all the time in the U.S. - but when your PM is visiting on a critical mission to empower India in the face of a challenging geopolitical environment, your lobbying of the U.S. lawmakers to work against the interest of your own country (and that of mine) is poor form. In contrast, very few republicans will work against the current administration in their dealings with China. They wouldn’t lobby EU lawmakers to undermine President Biden for instance, even though many are unhappy with what’s happening with Trump or LGBTQ+ policies, both hot-button topics for Republicans. https://twitter.com/mairal/status/1671337141329092610
War Industries
India is making weapons and reducing imports from War Industries. This is not accepted to War Weapon manufacturers. It may result in very difficult period for India's growth line. Particularly Modi must be careful. Zee news inform about War Industry propaganda against India.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JTc3PVlBZWs
Democracies by John Mearsmeier : USA may destroy other democracies who are against US interests. https://twitter.com/QuincyInst/status/1567231530862256128
"Yakub Khan terrorist death praised by Muslims in Mumbai. 257 people killed in 1993 Mumbai serial blasts. Terrorist Yakub Memon financed the blasts. He was hanged in 2015. Now after 7 years, his grave decorated NC leader Mustafa Kamal justified & called it a 'display of love' That's what happens when you hand over terrorists' bodies."
https://twitter.com/AskAnshul/status/1567839715042402305
Introduction:
Corruption “is an
ancient problem (fourth century B.C. in India)”[1].
“Corruption represents a common issue globally. Due to the common perception
that corruption hinders economic development and prevents particularly
developing countries from sustainably addressing poverty, both emerging market
economies and democratically developed countries have begun to seriously
consider the economic harm of corruption and have thus begun to invest in
resources to prevent and control corruption”[2].
Corruption is like a white ant in the wood. It eats away at the pillars
(institutions) of the democratic governance judiciary, executive, legislative,
media, and non-governmental organizations (NGOs). Civilization crumbles
unnoticed.
In this essay, I shall briefly define corruption and the types, practices, motives, and costs of corruption as per
literature. I shall then explain methods to combat corruption in developing
countries of well-ordered peoples theorized by Rawls and suggested by Brock. I
reason corruption can be fought efficiently and effectively by adopting and
strengthening institutions of a democratic system with accountability. Combating corruption from top to the
bottom or bottom to the top are two sides of the same coin. Vigilant, non-corrupt
media is important to protect basic liberties. “Without a free press, citizens
might not even be aware of injustices and violations of basic liberties
perpetrated by the ruling powers… in holding their governments to account”.[3] I advocate
free press and media, political will, an independent judiciary, transparency,
and well-defined powers of administrative powers of executives to combat corruption.
In a democracy, People ‘deliberate and legitimate’[4] political will to implement rule of law. Institutions so empowered will reinstate political and civil liberties ‘on the ground’[5]. Corruption is an economic criminal offense. Brock rightly wrote “No one should be above the law; everyone must feel that they could be held to account for their behavior. A culture of impunity must not be allowed to prevail”[6].
What is corruption:
As per D’Agostino “the world
bank settled on - “the abuse of public office for private gain as the usable
definition of corruption”[7].
Transparency International defines it as “the abuse of entrusted power for
private gain”[8].
Hellman argues that “corruption is a derivative concept A. in theory and B. in
practice ”.[9]
The same is explained by Miller.[10]
Types of Corruption:
If we look at the MONIAC
Machine[11]
and Arthakranti[12]
YouTube video, there shall be three different types of
leakage. These can be large, small, and wilful leakage by an operator. The same
is defined by academic authors as grand, petit, and political corruption. In
Bill Phillip’s Machine as explained by Anil Bokil Arthakranti, leakage is
corruption. Combating corruption means stopping leakages of the system.
Practices of Corruption:
Brock summarises “Many
practices are described as corrupt, including bribery, misappropriation of
public resources for private ends, inappropriate use of influence, state
capture, nepotism, and some conflicts of interest”[13].
Motives of Corruption:
There are many motives
for corrupt actions. It includes desires for wealth accumulation, status and
power. Corruption involves corruptor, corrupted and corrupt action.
Cost of Corruption
Literature Review
“Corruption distorts
priorities, exacerbates inequalities, hampers economic growth, and often
results in considerable harm”, is a huge cause of exit and
migration, and security challenges”[14], [15]. Bayley explains the harmful
and beneficial effects of corrupt acts.[16] I am of the opinion that the beneficial effects mentioned by him are temporary and for the gain of a few
individuals. I believe corrupt acts are evil in a society and it should always
be combated; though “effects of corruption depend on the extent to which
bureaucrats coordinate their rent-seeking behaviour”.[17] But according to Mauro “Corruption has
substantial, adverse effects on economic growth… when corruption is widespread,
individuals do not have incentives to fight it even if everybody would be
better off without it”.[18]
It confirms that
corruption is a huge problem that prevents developing countries from
sustainably addressing poverty. Rawls
and Brock provide methods to combat corruption. Brock analyzed and explained in
detail[19].
I shall quote mainly Brock and add my comments wherever I think it needs.
Methods to combat
corruption
As per Rawls
“Liberal peoples have three basic features: a
reasonably just constitutional democratic government that serves their
fundamental interests; citizens united by what Mill called “common sympathies”;
and finally, a moral nature. The first is institutional, the second is
cultural, and the third requires a firm attachment to political (moral)
conceptions of right and justice[20]…
What institutions and practices might be necessary to keep a constitutional
democratic government reasonably just, and to prevent it from being corrupted,
is a huge topic … that it is necessary to frame institutions in such a way as
to motivate people sufficiently, both citizens and government officers, to
honor them, and remove the obvious temptations to corruption”.[21]
I agree with Rawls that
institutions can implement the agenda of the government.
He assumes that ‘political principles for a
reasonably just constitutional regime allow us to deal with a great variety of
cases [including corruption], if not all.”[22]
Democratic
system, political will, rule of law and basic
liberties are key requirements to combat corruption. All are important to
combat corruption. Institutions (legislative assembly, judiciary,
executives like bureaucrats, inspectors) implement laws and rules of well-ordered
peoples. “Public reasoning aims for public justifications”[23]
Press and media, NGOs help in educating people and developing reasoning for
justifications.
“Deliberative democracy also recognizes that
without education in the basic aspects of constitutional democratic government
for all citizens, and without a public informed about pressing problems,
crucial political and social decisions simply cannot be made”.[24]
Press and media play an important
part.
As per Brock “Authors
agree that there is something akin to a universal understanding of what
corruption is, and all dispute the idea that corruption may simply be in the
eye of the beholder. However, there are also sharp disagreements – for example
over whether corruption is best eliminated from the top down, or whether
bottom-up approaches are more effective”[25]. I
believe top-down or bottom-up approaches are two sides of the same coin and both must act simultaneously to
combat corruption effectively. Top-down means from the president / prime minister/ chief
minister downwards to a government worker. The bottom-up approach means “public
deliberation about the issues that need to be addressed and the options for
resolving them”[26] [
in democracy].
Let me explain it more in detail.
To combat corruption
there should be political will, which can be propagated by media and NGOs. Brock
mentioned, “In 2003, it was found that 17 percent of the world’s population live in countries with a free press, 40
percent have a partly free press, and 43 percent have a press that is not free
... These figures do show a considerable decline over recent years”[27].
Transparency International noted that democratic countries are the least
corrupt. People deliberate powers to politicians. Due to this, political will (top to bottom) is the first step. This political will shall set the agenda for the media and activities of NGOs.
In many countries, media and NGOs create rhetoric to combat corruption. This rhetoric may support corrupt politicians who may support their evil masters or elites. I add that some corrupt media, NGOs, legislators, and bureaucrats are cunning (extra/over intelligent) to hide their motives and support corruption till exposed by competing media, NGOs, and non-corrupt institutions.
I agree with Brock that
media does not play a constructive part in all societies. She
mentions “Having a free press is a necessary but not a sufficient condition for
the adequate protection of basic liberties.”[28] She
further writes that “press freedom must be
balanced with press responsibility”[29] and explains several common reasons why a free press is
not enjoyed in corrupt societies: Reasons are usually given that “Media is a mouthpiece for the ruling regime”, “violence against
journalists”, “legislation
and financial pressures”, “threatening tax audits”
etc[30]. In addition, media is controlled by elites in some countries.
Brock quote Vogl.
“It is not governments that are leading the anti-corruption charge, instead it is a grand adhoc
coalition of civil society activists, journalists, philanthropists, and
scholars. And in the years to come, it will continue to be the case that these
forces will set the agenda, press governments with mounting vigor and impact
reforms and monitor the measures announced to see that they are effectively
implemented.[31]”
Broc adds Vogl viewpoint that a “powerful combination of forces is steadily
amassing, helping national anti-corruption movements grow in strength every
day”[32].
I agree it is true but not in all cases. Indian example (from 2014 till today) indicates
that most media and NGOs are setting an agenda in favor of corrupt
politics which may create unrest in a developing country like India. This
happens more vigorously during an election year
(Indian elections are due in 2019). This instability
shall be exploited by international capital elites.
Brock clarifies “Freedom of speech does not entail that we may say whatever we like, wherever we like. Clearly, such ‘freedoms must be constrained by others’ freedoms”[33].
According to her “some
cultures embrace ways of life that seem not to value liberty”[34] I am of the opinion all cultures value liberty. Only some
rulers of those cultures do not value liberty. Those who are financially or circumstantially
dependent on such a ruler value obedience. Personal freedom is wanted but under
compulsion, obedience is accepted. She clarifies my reasons as “to be able to engage in such activities one must typically
enjoy a number of basic liberties, such as freedom from coercion, attack, and
torture”.[35]
This may be why slaves were not allowed to vote in some countries.
If slaves would have been allowed, then either these slaves would have
voted in favour or against the owner. In both cases democratic representation
would not have been correct. This doubt was cleared by Vogl which is quoted
by Brock by stating that ‘no known culture “values dishonesty and
unfairness”.[36] No culture likes corruption[37].
Theory without practice is sterile
and practice without theory is blind. I shall now explain methods adopted in
India to combat corruption. BJP government won 2014 parliament elections. It is
to be noted before 2014, there was a congress party in India that was not only
corrupt but was supporting corrupt political parties and used to purchase media
journalists.[38]
India meets all my assumptions. It is a democratic country. Instrument of
politics were mostly corrupt. Corrupt media, NGOs, bureaucrats, police, sales
tax, income tax, and even judiciary as chief ministers, including the ruling congress party president, were also corrupt. Corrupt media favored corruption
and corrupt in India.
But some in all instruments were not corrupt. Narendra Modi was not corrupt. People believed and trusted him and voted him to power in the 2014 parliament elections. He got the majority and started combating corruption by implementing steps like demonetizing currency, smart cards, transparency, tax reform, auditing of bank and government departments by independent auditors, checking illicit financial flows by routing all finances through banks, procurement reform, utilizing new technology, creating transparent systems, making judiciary independent (judiciary was independent but due to all around corrupt practices many judges of the supreme court also became corrupt), selecting non-corrupt chief ministers and parliament ministers.
Corrupt media often created rhetoric against political decisions in favor of the corrupt. But the majority
of reasonable people did not follow the media blindly. This proves[39]
that corruption can be combated from top to bottom, but the fact remains people
delegated power to Modi which he could exercise. If there would not have been a
proper non-corrupt alternative, people would have delegated powers to the wrong
person and corruption would not have been combated.
Slowly Modi tightened corrupt media,
NGOs, judiciary, executives etc. But again, it was not possible without
non-corrupt media, executives etc. Corruption can be combated by the top
(leadership) with the help of the bottom (people- who delegate the power to top
leadership) and both are important. In addition, it is only possible in a democracy.
This example confirms methods to
combat corruption stipulated by Rawls for well-ordered peoples, and methods
advocated by Vogl, Rotberg, and Varraich summarised by Brock are worth
implementing.
Brock quotes Varraich “without a
reasonably competent, impartial, uncorrupted, honest, and effective public
administration, representative democracy is unlikely to deliver or increase
human well-being”[40]
Brock also quotes Vogl: “Much of the corruption on this planet stems from the
willingness of the governments of rich nations to provide exceptional support
to corrupt overseas leaders in exchange for arms deals; rights to oil, gas, and
mining resources; and strategic relationships”[41]
I agree as media and NGOs owned by multinational companies (MNC) supported the corrupt congress party. MNCs controlled media through cumbersome shareholding structures and obliged some NGOs by paying huge amounts. Brock also quoted Rothstein and Varraich stating that corruption “usually occurs at the intersection of public and private spheres”.[42]
Examples are many in India. Nationalized banks gave a loan to big industrialists, who did not pay the amount and migrated outside India.[43] World Bank emphasizes enhancing transparency, implementing anti-money laundering, and tax reforms.[44] As an example, it explains how corruption could be combated in Nigeria, India, and the Dominican Republic.
Conclusion:
Combating corruption is a systematic, comprehensive, and persistent effort. I reasoned corruption is least in democratic countries and can be removed from the top to bottom by strengthening democratic institutions like the judiciary, executives, and legislatures. Media and NGOs convince/educate people that corruption causes poverty and conflicts, then people may / will elect non-corrupt legislators/members of parliament. The political will / legislative power will create institutions that will implement rule of law in executive functioning with modern gadgets which may promote transparency. This may minimize corruption if not eliminated. As corruption corrodes society slowly, in the same way corrupt practices of the community can be controlled/minimized by the continuous persistent will of people including non-corrupt NGOs, media, and elected representatives. It is a slow process as the habits of the people/thinking of people cannot be switched on and off like an electric bulb.
Read also https://unnwo.blogspot.com/2021/04/corruption-in-india.html
Bibliography:
“Combating Corruption.”
The World Bank. September 26, 2017. http://www.worldbank.org/en/topic/governance/brief/anti-corruption.
“Corruption.” In
International Encyclopaedia of the Social Sciences, Edited by William A.
Darity, Jr., 2nd ed., Vol. 2, Macmillan Reference USA, 2008, pp.
143-146. Gale Virtual Reference Library,
http://link.galegroup.com/apps/doc/CX3045300467/GVRL?u=learn&sid=GVRL&xid=2e115481
Arthakranti AD.
“Arthakranti – what is it?” Filmed Month Year not known. Youtube Video, 4:59.
21 March 2014. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ile1zmBD2rQ
Bardhan, P. “Corruption
and Development: A Review of Issues”. Journal of Economic Literature 35,
no.3(1997): 1320-1346. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/2729979
Bayley, D.H. “The
Effects of Corruption in a Developing Nation.” The Western Political Quarterly
19, no. 4 (1966): 719-732. Retrieved from http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/106591296601900410
Blackburn, K., and Forgues-Puccio, G.F. “Why is
corruption less harmful in some countries than in others?” Journal of Economic
Behaviour & Organization 72, (2009): 797-810. Retrieved from
http://doi:10.1016/j.jebo.2009.08.009
Brock, G. “How Should We
Combat Corruption? Lessons from Theory and Practice.” Ethics &
International Affairs 32, Special Issue
no.1 (27 November 2017): 103-117. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0892679417000508
Brock, Gillian. Global Justice A Cosmopolitan
Account. New York: Oxford University (2009).
D’Agostino, G., Dunne,
J.P.,and Pieroni,L. “Government Spending, Corruption and Economic Growth.”
World Development 84, (2016): 190-205. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2016.03.011
Dzhumashev, R.
“Corruption and growth: The role of governance, public spending, and economic
development.” Economic Modelling 37, (2014): 202-215.
Hellman, D. “Defining
Corruption and Constitutionalizing Democracy.” Michigan Law Review 111, (2013):
1385-1422.
Huang, Chiung-Ju. “Is
corruption bad for economic growth? Evidence from Asia – Pacific Countries.”
North American Journal of Economics and Finance 35, (2016): 247-256
Ionescu, Luminita. “The
Role of Government Auditing in Curbing Corruption.” Economics, Management and
Financial Markets; Woodside 9, no. 3 (2014): 122-127.
Mauro, P. (2004). “The
Persistence of Corruption and Slow Economic Growth.” International Monetary
Fund Staff Papers 51, no.1 (2004): 1-18. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/30035860
Meon, P-G., and Weill,
L. “Is Corruption an Efficient Grease?” Word Development 38, no. 3 (2010):
244-259. Retrieved from http://dx/doi:10.1016/j.worlddev.2009.06.004
Miller, Seumas.
“Corruption.” Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy/ Spring 2011 Edition. Edward
N. Zalta (ed.) Assessed on 26 February 2018 from URL=<Qt
http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2011/entries/corruption/
Rawls, John. “Two
Concepts of Rules.” The Philosophical Review 64, no.1 (1955): 3-32. Assessed on
11 March 2018 from http://www.jstor.org/stable/2182230
Reservebankofnz. “Making
Money Flow: The MONIAC.” Filmed date unknown. Youtube video, 4:37.https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rAZavOcEnLg
Xing Ni, J.M. (2008).
“Toward a clean government in China: does the budget reform provide a hope?”
Crime Law Society Change 49, (2008): 119-138. Retrieved from
http://doi:10.1007/s10611-008-9101-0
Notes / References
[1] Bardhan, “Corruption and Development: A
Review of Issues,” 1.
[2] Huang, “Is Corruption bad for economic
growth? Evidence from Asia-Pacific countries,” 1-2.
[3] Brock, Global Justice A Cosmopolitan
Account, 161.
[4] Brock,100.
[5] Brock, 157.
[6] Brock, 166.
[7] D’Agostino, Dunne and Pieroni, “Government
Spending, Corruption and Economic Growth,” 190.
[8] Transparency International Home, “What is
Corruption”
[9] Hellman, “Defining Corruption and Constitutionalizing Democracy,”
1391 and 1396.
[10] Miller, “Corruption”, Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
[11] Reservebankofnz, “Making Money Flow: The
Moniac” Youtube Video.
[12] ArthakrantiAD, “Arthkranti - what is it?”
Youtube Video.
[13] Brock, “How Should We Combat Corruption?
Lessons from Theory and Practice,”103
[14] Brock, 105
[15] D’Agostino, Dunne and Pieroni, “Government Spending, corruption and
Economic Growth,” 190-205. They prove empirically that corruption effects
growth negatively.
[16] Bayley, “The Effects of Corruption in a Developing Nation”,724 and
726. It may be good in a developing nation but once allowed politicians and
civil servants constitute an elite and slowly gangsters and mafia takes over good
intentions of elites.
[17] Blackburn and Forgues-Puccio, “Why is corruption less harmful in
some countries than in others?” 797.
[18] Mauro, “The Persistence of Corruption and Slow Economic Growth” 1
and 17.
[19] Gillian Brock, “How Should We Combat
Corruption? Lessons from Theory and Practice,” Ethics & International
Affairs 32, Special Issue no. 1(2017): 103-117.
[20] Rawls, The Law of Peoples, 23.
[21] Rawls,, 24.
[22] Rawls, 25.
[23] Rawls, 155
[24] Rawls, 139.
[25] Brock, “How should We Combat Corruption?
Lessons from Theory and Practice,” 117.
[26] Brock, Global Justice A Cosmopolitan
Account, 100.
[27] Brock, Global Justice A Cosmopolitan
Account, 162.
[28] Brock, 161.
[29] Brock, 161.
[30] Brock, 163.
[31] Brock, “How Should We Combat Corruption? Lessons
from Theory and Practice”,109.
[32] Brock, 109
[33] Brock, Global Justice A Cosmopolitan
Account, 153.
[34] Brock, 154.
[35] Brock, 155.
[36] Brock, “How should We Combat Corruption?
Lessons from Theory and Practice,” 113.
[37] Brock, 113.
[38] “68 Journalists, writers and
bureaucrats given 2.5 lakh/month to write against PM Modi through Cambridge
Analytica!”, April http://postcard.news/68-journalists-writers-and-bureaucrats-given-2-5-lakh-month-to-write-against-pm-modi-through-cambridge-analytica/
[39] World Bank confirmed, that
smart card played an important part to combat corruption in India. “Combating
Corruption,” The World Bank, September 26, 2017, http://www.worldbank.org/en/topic/governance/brief/anti-currpution
[40] Brock, “How Should We Combat Corruption? Lessons from
Theory and Practice”, 110.
[41] Brock,, 110.
[42] Brock, 110.
[43] Nirav Modi, Mallya and bank
cases in India. Examples are also mentioned by Brock of five largest banks of
wall street.
[44] World Bank, “Combating Corruption”.
